Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Red card or should be a yellow card for Kewell
[0 vote(s)]



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2386
Date:
Red card or should be a yellow card for Kewell
Permalink   


http://soccernet.espn.go.com/report?id=264052&cc=5901&ver=us


"It's devastating for me," Kewell said. "There was no intent. The referee has killed my World Cup."Kewell said he had to watch the rest of the match in the dressing room with a security guard.

__________________


animated-graphics247.gif



Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

I am in Australia and I do not really like socceroos very much but giving the redcord is a bid unjust because this ball to hand (he didnot intent to touch the ball). However, if we saw the prvious matches when a player meant to touch the ball or hand to ball, the referee just gave him only a yellow.

What about your opinions folks?


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2386
Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:

I am in Australia and I do not really like socceroos very much but giving the redcord is a bid unjust because this ball to hand (he didnot intent to touch the ball). However, if we saw the prvious matches when a player meant to touch the ball or hand to ball, the referee just gave him only a yellow.

What about your opinions folks?




Yes i do agree, the ref was very strict and i guess the australian fans were not satisfied with the ref?



__________________


animated-graphics247.gif



Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

the ref has no choice.   Harry Kewell was on the goal line.  The ball was going into the net.  He raised his arm.  The correct call was made.

__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink   

khonthakek wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I am in Australia and I do not really like socceroos very much but giving the redcord is a bid unjust because this ball to hand (he didnot intent to touch the ball). However, if we saw the prvious matches when a player meant to touch the ball or hand to ball, the referee just gave him only a yellow.

What about your opinions folks?




Yes i do agree, the ref was very strict and i guess the australian fans were not satisfied with the ref?



u guys dont understand football... it was the right decision for the ref no  matter wether it was on his intention or not... because he was broking the goal...



 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2386
Date:
Permalink   

Anonymous wrote:

 

khonthakek wrote:

 

Anonymous wrote:

I am in Australia and I do not really like socceroos very much but giving the redcord is a bid unjust because this ball to hand (he didnot intent to touch the ball). However, if we saw the prvious matches when a player meant to touch the ball or hand to ball, the referee just gave him only a yellow.

What about your opinions folks?




Yes i do agree, the ref was very strict and i guess the australian fans were not satisfied with the ref?



u guys dont understand football... it was the right decision for the ref no  matter wether it was on his intention or not... because he was broking the goal...



 

 



you seem understand football more than anyone here right?? the ref was right to give a penalty , but ref should have given only a yellow card and penalty shoot out is enough for Gnana...and it 's fair for both team.

 



__________________


animated-graphics247.gif



ed


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 203
Date:
Permalink   

Yes for penalty but no red card for sure, that was a hash dicision the ball hit his arm while he try to use his chest to block a ball a yellow and penalty would be justify.
Tim Cahill also was a victim of bad dicision from the ref on previous match against Germany.


__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard