Revealed: how the Vietnamese military fuels destruction of Laos' forests

Date: Jul 29, 2011

Revealed: how the Vietnamese military fuels destruction of Laos' forests

Date: Jul 29, 2011

The second part

Nia · Senior Member

It's time to get rid of these Vietnamese businessmen in Laos. Laos isn't getting nothing from them for the last 40 years. It's time to stand up and find our new friends with benefit for both our country. Laos will not progress in the future if we still let these barbaric Vietnamese eating up all of our resource alone!! Soon Laos will be a barren land and less people. The only way for the future of Laos is to sell our country to someone else because no more resources left. Everyone will eventually leave Laos as a wasteland.

Date: Jul 30, 2011

Lao leader have to pay the Vietnamese army back for the Vietnamese soldiers invaded Laos and keep the Lao government to stay in power.

Date: Jul 30, 2011

Laos is part of Vietnam since 1975 so what 's wrong with that ?

Date: Jul 30, 2011

Laos is part of Vietnam since 1975 so what 's wrong with that ?

____________________________________________________________________

It is wrong for vietnamese army to destroy environment of laos' forest and it is also wrong when you consider that lao is part of vietnam and lao is indepence country that it is not a part of vietnam and the whole world know. it is wrong when Lao PDR allowed it to happening.

Date: Jul 30, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Laos is part of Vietnam since 1975 so what 's wrong with that ?

Only thieves would say such a thing.

Date: Jul 30, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Laos is part of Vietnam since 1975 so what 's wrong with that ?
____________________________________________________________________
It is wrong for vietnamese army to destroy environment of laos' forest and it is also wrong when you consider that laois part of vietnam and laois independent country that it is not a part of vietnam and the whole world know. it is wrong when Lao PDR allowed it to happening.

So what are you going to do about . Even your leader and your government don;t even have a gut to say a word, boy. Laos could not do any thing without Vietnamese army permission . So shut up for your safety and your family safety. Vietnam will do to Laos what ever Vietnamese army please, so shut up.

Date: Jul 30, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Laos is part of Vietnam since 1975 so what 's wrong with that ?
Only thieves would say such a thing.

It is a settlement that Lao people have to pay back the big price for many generation to come to Vietnam for the Vietnamese solders who invaded Lao and died in Laos and to protect Lao government from Ryoyal army and Thailand and Esan to take more Lao territory since the French gave up fighting in 1955 and gave the independent to French Indochina.

Date: Jul 30, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Laos is part of Vietnam since 1975 so what 's wrong with that ?
Only thieves would say such a thing.
It is a settlement that Lao people have to pay back the big price for many generation to come to Vietnam for the Vietnamese solders who invaded Lao and died in Laos and to protect Lao government from Ryoyal army and Thailand and Esan to take more Lao territory since the French gave up fighting in 1955 and gave the independent to French Indochina.

Vietnamese army are not to help Lao government without getting something back . There will be a long time for Lao people to pay back because Laos own Vietnam a lot of money. Perhaps all of the wood , copper mine , rubber trees and some more kilometer of land by the border must be given to Vitenam for the setllement that is the Vietnamese right to come to live in Laos land freely without to arrested for no legal documents. There is nothing any one in Laos or in the the world could do not even the United Nation. So shut up.

Date: Jul 30, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Laos is part of Vietnam since 1975 so what 's wrong with that ?
____________________________________________________________________
It is wrong for vietnamese army to destroy environment of laos' forest and it is also wrong when you consider that laois part of vietnam and laois independent country that it is not a part of vietnam and the whole world know. it is wrong when Lao PDR allowed it to happening.
So what are you going to do about . Even your leader and your government don;t even have a gut to say a word, boy. Laos could not do any thing without Vietnamese army permission . So shut up for your safety and your family safety. Vietnam will do to Laos what ever Vietnamese army please, so shut up.

Shut your faggot ass up. You dog eating Viets need to go back to Vietnam where you belong.

Date: Jul 30, 2011

Matter of fact Vietnamese like the tiger and the Chinese like the crocodile to Lao people. So Lao people are in no winning situation . If it is going to be like this ,maybe Laos to be under the French or still be part of Siam still better than this at least Esan and Lao languge are similar and same culture and religion unlike Vietnamese .

Date: Jul 31, 2011

Vietnam is Laos master simple as that so Vietnam could chop down as much as Lao trees they want . Do you realize that Vietnam has been indirectly conquering Laos since 1975. Every government building and every department there must have some Vietnamese office to monitor or look over Lao officers.

Date: Jul 31, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Laos is part of Vietnam since 1975 so what 's wrong with that ?
____________________________________________________________________
It is wrong for vietnamese army to destroy environment of laos' forest and it is also wrong when you consider that laois part of vietnam and laois independent country that it is not a part of vietnam and the whole world know. it is wrong when Lao PDR allowed it to happening.
So what are you going to do about . Even your leader and your government don;t even have a gut to say a word, boy. Laos could not do any thing without Vietnamese army permission . So shut up for your safety and your family safety. Vietnam will do to Laos what ever Vietnamese army please, so shut up.
Shut your faggot ass up. You dog eating Viets need to go back to Vietnam where you belong.

Without Vietnamese Laos would not be where Laos is today and no peace and still killing each other for the power. Lao could not rule Laos without Vietnam. So Lao wood are the Vietnamese army settlement to give Lao government protection. So shut up.

Date: Jul 31, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Laos is part of Vietnam since 1975 so what 's wrong with that ?
____________________________________________________________________
It is wrong for vietnamese army to destroy environment of laos' forest and it is also wrong when you consider that laois part of vietnam and laois independent country that it is not a part of vietnam and the whole world know. it is wrong when Lao PDR allowed it to happening.
So what are you going to do about . Even your leader and your government don;t even have a gut to say a word, boy. Laos could not do any thing without Vietnamese army permission . So shut up for your safety and your family safety. Vietnam will do to Laos what ever Vietnamese army please, so shut up.
Shut your faggot ass up. You dog eating Viets need to go back to Vietnam where you belong.
Without Vietnamese Laos would not be where Laos is today and no peace and still killing each other for the power. Lao could not rule Laos without Vietnam. So Lao wood are the Vietnamese army settlement to give Lao government protection. So shut up.

That is a very ignorant comment. If Laos believed in killing each other, Laos would have done what Thailand did to the Communist. Thailand eradicated the Communist movement in Thailand.

Laos didn't do that because we wanted to work things out with the Communists. Being the liars and cheaters that they are, they did not live up to their end of the agreement.

Date: Aug 1, 2011

Every things there are the price to pay that Vietnam help Laos. Vietnamese army take to wood from Laos that is the settlement for the Vietnamese soldiers who lost their lives in Laos to keep Lao government in power and to give Laos the protection.Vietnam have the right to wood, copper, rubber plantation and other business with little tax or tax exemption for many decades to come that is in the treaty between Vietnam and Laos.

Date: Aug 2, 2011

Laos is dominated or conquered by Vietnam. Vietnamese army could do what ever they want in Laos. Laos lost the war to Vietnam in 1975 that was the end of it. Thousand of Laotian fled Laos. So million of Vietnamese occupied Laos.

Date: Aug 4, 2011

Laos is colonized by Vietnam so Lao wood , copper , Robber plantation are Vietnamese army property.

Date: Aug 4, 2011

It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”

Date: Aug 4, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”

If you Meo love Vietnamese so much then why don't you go and live there. And find out how Vietnamese treat Meo. Trust me it ain't pretty.

Date: Aug 4, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”

If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.

Date: Aug 5, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.

Israeli has much less population than Arab but Israeli kick the Arab ass every war. Not because of number of people but the unity of the people and how intelligent their people are specially their leader and their government.

Date: Aug 5, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.
Israeli has much less population than Arab but Israeli kick the Arab ass every war. Not because of number of people but the unity of the people and how intelligent their people are specially their leader and their government.

Israel is supported by the United States. Plus, Israel have modern weapons. You can't compare Laos to Israel.

If Laos have the same population as Vietnam or Thailand, then none of these countries can pick on Laos.

Date: Aug 7, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.
Israeli has much less population than Arab but Israeli kick the Arab ass every war. Not because of number of people but the unity of the people and how intelligent their people are specially their leader and their government.
Israel is supported by the United States. Plus, Israel have modern weapons. You can't compare Laos to Israel.
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam or Thailand, then none of these countries can pick on Laos.

Lao people chose Vietnam over the United States unlike Israel . Lane Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam and Lao always betray their own king or their own people for the power by support Siamese to beat Lao king. Lao was very big but never united and always weak.

Date: Aug 7, 2011

Lao people chose Vietnam over the United States unlike Israel . Lane Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam and Lao always betray their own king or their own people for the power by support Siamese to beat Lao king. Lao was very big but never united and always weak.
_______________________________________________________

I am strong agreed with you because lao people are naive in this planet earth and they like to betray own king and their ownselve-fishness to worthship other racist, instead of believing our own people, that's why Siam took advantage of Lane Xang, so It is happening to Lao PDR rigth now, and they truely believe Vietnamese people very much, as you can see anywhere in lao all business own by Vietnamese people from the top to bottom, but Lao people cannot event allowed cut woods to build their house. But they allowed Vietnamese to destroy forestry and environment. I think that ashamed of Lao PDR powerless.

Nia · Senior Member

Anonymous wrote:
Lao people chose Vietnam over the United States unlike Israel . Lane Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam and Lao always betray their own king or their own people for the power by support Siamese to beat Lao king. Lao was very big but never united and always weak.
_______________________________________________________
I am strong agreed with you because lao people are naive in this planet earth and they like to betray own king and their ownselve-fishness to worthship other racist, instead of believing our own people, that's why Siam took advantage of Lane Xang, so It is happening to Lao PDR rigth now, and they truely believe Vietnamese people very much, as you can see anywhere in lao all business own by Vietnamese people from the top to bottom, but Lao people cannot event allowed cut woods to build their house. But they allowed Vietnamese to destroy forestry and environment. I think that ashamed of Lao PDR powerless.

I think the reason why trees are being cut down in Laos is because the Meo cannot hide in the dense jungle and cause problems ever again. Thier are many rogue Meo in hiding in the jungle of Laos because its easy to hide from civilization and enemy.

Soon the Meo will have no where to hide in the jungle of Laos. At least now they will be sticking out like sore thumb! 555555+ It's the end for them Meo rogue jungle people now. aww

Date: Aug 7, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.
Israeli has much less population than Arab but Israeli kick the Arab ass every war. Not because of number of people but the unity of the people and how intelligent their people are specially their leader and their government.
Israel is supported by the United States. Plus, Israel have modern weapons. You can't compare Laos to Israel.
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam or Thailand, then none of these countries can pick on Laos.
Lao people chose Vietnam over the United States unlike Israel . Lane Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam and Lao always betray their own king or their own people for the power by support Siamese to beat Lao king. Lao was very big but never united and always weak.

May i corrected you about your comment ? First of all, you said'' Lao people chosed Vietnam over the United States,'' and then, you said'' Lan Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam,'' these two eras doesn't mixed. Here why, Lao PDR's chosed Communist Vietnam over Superpower U.S.A. after 75 when Pathed Lao toke over the whole country because they had the same ideology, Were'you surprise on that ? and as for Lan Xang, this was way way back the end of thirteen centuries, and it was six- hundred thirties something years apart. you can't mixed these two eras up. So you need to do some research on both eras before you mixed them up together.otherwise, people might confusing and misleading on this topics. and as for the Israel, they the'' Israel didn't chose America, But the Yankees chosing them because the Israel is the real friend of the United States in midleeast that's the main reason, and U.S. government supporting them by giving them over two billion dollars a year for free and has the most powerful war machine in the world. Please do not assume that Israel alone beat those tugs in midleeast.otherwise, Israel can't stand alone with Syria, period.

Date: Aug 8, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.
Israeli has much less population than Arab but Israeli kick the Arab ass every war. Not because of number of people but the unity of the people and how intelligent their people are specially their leader and their government.
Israel is supported by the United States. Plus, Israel have modern weapons. You can't compare Laos to Israel.
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam or Thailand, then none of these countries can pick on Laos.
        Lao people chose Vietnam over the United States unlike Israel . Lane Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam and Lao always betray their own king or their own people for the power by support Siamese to beat Lao king. Lao was very big but never united and always weak.
May i corrected you about your comment ? First of all, you said'' Lao people chosen Vietnam over the United States,'' and then, you said'' Lan Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam,'' these two eras doesn't mixed. Here why, Lao PDR's chose Communist Vietnam over Superpower U.S.A. after 75 when Pathet Lao toke over the whole country because they had the same ideology, Were You surprise on that ? and as for Lan Xang, this was way way back the end of thirteen centuries, and it was six- hundred thirties something years apart. you can't mixed these two eras up. So you need to do some research on both eras before you mixed them up together.otherwise, people might confusing and misleading on this topics. and as for the Israel, they the'' Israel didn't chose America, But the Yankees choosing them because the Israel is the real friend of the United States in middle east that's the main reason, and U.S. government supporting them by giving them over two billion dollars a year for free and has the most powerful war machine in the world. Please do not assume that Israel alone beat those tugs in middle east.otherwise, Israel can't stand alone with Syria, period.

Any way Laos have always been controlled by the other country such as Burma, China , Vietnam, Siam and France . Today Laos is indirectly controlled by the Vietnamese army that you could see about the Vietnamese army smuggle Lao logs in Vietnam and no police and no Lao army dare to stop them . Soon Lao forest will be vanished . The country which the people are not united unlike Israeli, they are stick together and help each other . Look at Lao Lane Xang during Jao Anouvong , Luang Prabang and Champasack and Jao Noi Muang Puon ( Xieng Kuang) betrayed jao Anouvong .

Date: Aug 9, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.
Israeli has much less population than Arab but Israeli kick the Arab ass every war. Not because of number of people but the unity of the people and how intelligent their people are specially their leader and their government.
Israel is supported by the United States. Plus, Israel have modern weapons. You can't compare Laos to Israel.
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam or Thailand, then none of these countries can pick on Laos.
        Lao people chose Vietnam over the United States unlike Israel . Lane Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam and Lao always betray their own king or their own people for the power by support Siamese to beat Lao king. Lao was very big but never united and always weak.
May i corrected you about your comment ? First of all, you said'' Lao people chosen Vietnam over the United States,'' and then, you said'' Lan Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam,'' these two eras doesn't mixed. Here why, Lao PDR's chose Communist Vietnam over Superpower U.S.A. after 75 when Pathet Lao toke over the whole country because they had the same ideology, Were You surprise on that ? and as for Lan Xang, this was way way back the end of thirteen centuries, and it was six- hundred thirties something years apart. you can't mixed these two eras up. So you need to do some research on both eras before you mixed them up together.otherwise, people might confusing and misleading on this topics. and as for the Israel, they the'' Israel didn't chose America, But the Yankees choosing them because the Israel is the real friend of the United States in middle east that's the main reason, and U.S. government supporting them by giving them over two billion dollars a year for free and has the most powerful war machine in the world. Please do not assume that Israel alone beat those tugs in middle east.otherwise, Israel can't stand alone with Syria, period.
Any way Laos have always been controlled by the other country such as Burma, China , Vietnam, Siam and France . Today Laos is indirectly controlled by the Vietnamese army that you could see about the Vietnamese army smuggle Lao logs in Vietnam and no police and no Lao army dare to stop them . Soon Lao forest will be vanished . The country which the people are not united unlike Israeli, they are stick together and help each other . Look at Lao Lane Xang during Jao Anouvong , Luang Prabang and Champasack and Jao Noi Muang Puon ( Xieng Kuang) betrayed jao Anouvong .

Always? Lanxang dominated South East Asia until the kingdom fractured.

That's when Siam and Vietnam was able to control Laos.

Lanxang didn't exist when Chao Anou came along. It's true that Chao Anou was betrayed. But every country has a traitor.

Look at the famous American traitor, Benedict Arnold. He was a general during the American Revolutionary War against the British and he went to the side of the British.

When it's war, you can't count on your country men to be 100% loyal.

Date: Aug 10, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.
Israeli has much less population than Arab but Israeli kick the Arab ass every war. Not because of number of people but the unity of the people and how intelligent their people are specially their leader and their government.
Israel is supported by the United States. Plus, Israel have modern weapons. You can't compare Laos to Israel.
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam or Thailand, then none of these countries can pick on Laos.
        Lao people chose Vietnam over the United States unlike Israel . Lane Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam and Lao always betray their own king or their own people for the power by support Siamese to beat Lao king. Lao was very big but never united and always weak.
May i corrected you about your comment ? First of all, you said'' Lao people chosen Vietnam over the United States,'' and then, you said'' Lan Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam,'' these two eras doesn't mixed. Here why, Lao PDR's chose Communist Vietnam over Superpower U.S.A. after 75 when Pathet Lao toke over the whole country because they had the same ideology, Were You surprise on that ? and as for Lan Xang, this was way way back the end of thirteen centuries, and it was six- hundred thirties something years apart. you can't mixed these two eras up. So you need to do some research on both eras before you mixed them up together.otherwise, people might confusing and misleading on this topics. and as for the Israel, they the'' Israel didn't chose America, But the Yankees choosing them because the Israel is the real friend of the United States in middle east that's the main reason, and U.S. government supporting them by giving them over two billion dollars a year for free and has the most powerful war machine in the world. Please do not assume that Israel alone beat those tugs in middle east.otherwise, Israel can't stand alone with Syria, period.
Any way Laos have always been controlled by the other country such as Burma, China , Vietnam, Siam and France . Today Laos is indirectly controlled by the Vietnamese army that you could see about the Vietnamese army smuggle Lao logs in Vietnam and no police and no Lao army dare to stop them . Soon Lao forest will be vanished . The country which the people are not united unlike Israeli, they are stick together and help each other . Look at Lao Lane Xang during Jao Anouvong , Luang Prabang and Champasak and Yao Noi Muang Puon ( Xiang Guang) betrayed jao Anouvong .
Always? Lanxang dominated South East Asia until the kingdom fractured.
That's when Siam and Vietnam was able to control Laos.
Lanxang didn't exist when Chao Anou came along. It's true that Chao Anou was betrayed. But every country has a traitor.
Look at the famous American traitor, Benedict Arnold. He was a general during the American Revolutionary War against the British and he went to the side of the British.
When it's war, you can't count on your country men to be 100% loyal.

American have many different kind of people from many countries and different race and Benedict Arnold's family came from Eurpe perhaps England. Lao betrayed Lao who were brother and cuisine to be in power even had to murder the own family member to bring the Siam or Vietnamese to conquer Laos.

Date: Aug 10, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.
Israeli has much less population than Arab but Israeli kick the Arab ass every war. Not because of number of people but the unity of the people and how intelligent their people are specially their leader and their government.
Israel is supported by the United States. Plus, Israel have modern weapons. You can't compare Laos to Israel.
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam or Thailand, then none of these countries can pick on Laos.
        Lao people chose Vietnam over the United States unlike Israel . Lane Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam and Lao always betray their own king or their own people for the power by support Siamese to beat Lao king. Lao was very big but never united and always weak.
May i corrected you about your comment ? First of all, you said'' Lao people chosen Vietnam over the United States,'' and then, you said'' Lan Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam,'' these two eras doesn't mixed. Here why, Lao PDR's chose Communist Vietnam over Superpower U.S.A. after 75 when Pathet Lao toke over the whole country because they had the same ideology, Were You surprise on that ? and as for Lan Xang, this was way way back the end of thirteen centuries, and it was six- hundred thirties something years apart. you can't mixed these two eras up. So you need to do some research on both eras before you mixed them up together.otherwise, people might confusing and misleading on this topics. and as for the Israel, they the'' Israel didn't chose America, But the Yankees choosing them because the Israel is the real friend of the United States in middle east that's the main reason, and U.S. government supporting them by giving them over two billion dollars a year for free and has the most powerful war machine in the world. Please do not assume that Israel alone beat those tugs in middle east.otherwise, Israel can't stand alone with Syria, period.
Any way Laos have always been controlled by the other country such as Burma, China , Vietnam, Siam and France . Today Laos is indirectly controlled by the Vietnamese army that you could see about the Vietnamese army smuggle Lao logs in Vietnam and no police and no Lao army dare to stop them . Soon Lao forest will be vanished . The country which the people are not united unlike Israeli, they are stick together and help each other . Look at Lao Lane Xang during Jao Anouvong , Luang Prabang and Champasak and Yao Noi Muang Puon ( Xiang Guang) betrayed jao Anouvong .
Always? Lanxang dominated South East Asia until the kingdom fractured.
That's when Siam and Vietnam was able to control Laos.
Lanxang didn't exist when Chao Anou came along. It's true that Chao Anou was betrayed. But every country has a traitor.
Look at the famous American traitor, Benedict Arnold. He was a general during the American Revolutionary War against the British and he went to the side of the British.
When it's war, you can't count on your country men to be 100% loyal.
American have many different kind of people from many countries and different race and Benedict Arnold's family came from Eurpe perhaps England. Lao betrayed Lao who were brother and cuisine to be in power even had to murder the own family member to bring the Siam or Vietnamese to conquer Laos.

The founding fathers of the United States were of English ancestry. They fought against England for independence. Benedict Arnold fought against the British then went to the side he was fighting against. Treason and corruption exist everywhere.

Souvanna Phouma, the prime minister of Laos at the time let the Communist in because he wanted both sides to work things out. It didn't turn out that way as we all know.

Date: Aug 12, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.
Israeli has much less population than Arab but Israeli kick the Arab ass every war. Not because of number of people but the unity of the people and how intelligent their people are specially their leader and their government.
Israel is supported by the United States. Plus, Israel have modern weapons. You can't compare Laos to Israel.
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam or Thailand, then none of these countries can pick on Laos.
        Lao people chose Vietnam over the United States unlike Israel . Lane Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam and Lao always betray their own king or their own people for the power by support Siamese to beat Lao king. Lao was very big but never united and always weak.
May i corrected you about your comment ? First of all, you said'' Lao people chosen Vietnam over the United States,'' and then, you said'' Lan Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam,'' these two eras doesn't mixed. Here why, Lao PDR's chose Communist Vietnam over Superpower U.S.A. after 75 when Pathet Lao toke over the whole country because they had the same ideology, Were You surprise on that ? and as for Lan Xang, this was way way back the end of thirteen centuries, and it was six- hundred thirties something years apart. you can't mixed these two eras up. So you need to do some research on both eras before you mixed them up together.otherwise, people might confusing and misleading on this topics. and as for the Israel, they the'' Israel didn't chose America, But the Yankees choosing them because the Israel is the real friend of the United States in middle east that's the main reason, and U.S. government supporting them by giving them over two billion dollars a year for free and has the most powerful war machine in the world. Please do not assume that Israel alone beat those tugs in middle east.otherwise, Israel can't stand alone with Syria, period.
Any way Laos have always been controlled by the other country such as Burma, China , Vietnam, Siam and France . Today Laos is indirectly controlled by the Vietnamese army that you could see about the Vietnamese army smuggle Lao logs in Vietnam and no police and no Lao army dare to stop them . Soon Lao forest will be vanished . The country which the people are not united unlike Israeli, they are stick together and help each other . Look at Lao Lane Xang during Jao Anouvong , Luang Prabang and Champasak and Yao Noi Muang Poon ( Xiang Guang) betrayed jao Anouvong .
Always? Lanxang dominated South East Asia until the kingdom fractured.
That's when Siam and Vietnam was able to control Laos.
Lanxang didn't exist when Chao Anou came along. It's true that Chao Anou was betrayed. But every country has a traitor.
Look at the famous American traitor, Benedict Arnold. He was a general during the American Revolutionary War against the British and he went to the side of the British.
When it's war, you can't count on your country men to be 100% loyal.
American have many different kind of people from many countries and different race and Benedict Arnold's family came from Europe perhaps England. Lao betrayed Lao who were brother and cuisine to be in power even had to murder the own family member to bring the Siam or Vietnamese to conquer Laos.

The founding fathers of the United States were of English ancestry. They fought against England for independence. Benedict Arnold fought against the British then went to the side he was fighting against. Treason and corruption exist everywhere.
Souvanna Phouma, the prime minister of Laos at the time let the Communist in because he wanted both sides to work things out. It didn't turn out that way as we all know.

Souvanna Phouma was very honest and stupid with simple cheap trick of his younger brother . Laos should stay neutral and united and opened from all foreign investors then Laos will be more developed than Laos today.

Date: Aug 12, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.
Israeli has much less population than Arab but Israeli kick the Arab ass every war. Not because of number of people but the unity of the people and how intelligent their people are specially their leader and their government.
Israel is supported by the United States. Plus, Israel have modern weapons. You can't compare Laos to Israel.
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam or Thailand, then none of these countries can pick on Laos.
        Lao people chose Vietnam over the United States unlike Israel . Lane Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam and Lao always betray their own king or their own people for the power by support Siamese to beat Lao king. Lao was very big but never united and always weak.
May i corrected you about your comment ? First of all, you said'' Lao people chosen Vietnam over the United States,'' and then, you said'' Lan Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam,'' these two eras doesn't mixed. Here why, Lao PDR's chose Communist Vietnam over Superpower U.S.A. after 75 when Pathet Lao toke over the whole country because they had the same ideology, Were You surprise on that ? and as for Lan Xang, this was way way back the end of thirteen centuries, and it was six- hundred thirties something years apart. you can't mixed these two eras up. So you need to do some research on both eras before you mixed them up together.otherwise, people might confusing and misleading on this topics. and as for the Israel, they the'' Israel didn't chose America, But the Yankees choosing them because the Israel is the real friend of the United States in middle east that's the main reason, and U.S. government supporting them by giving them over two billion dollars a year for free and has the most powerful war machine in the world. Please do not assume that Israel alone beat those tugs in middle east.otherwise, Israel can't stand alone with Syria, period.
Any way Laos have always been controlled by the other country such as Burma, China , Vietnam, Siam and France . Today Laos is indirectly controlled by the Vietnamese army that you could see about the Vietnamese army smuggle Lao logs in Vietnam and no police and no Lao army dare to stop them . Soon Lao forest will be vanished . The country which the people are not united unlike Israeli, they are stick together and help each other . Look at Lao Lane Xang during Jao Anouvong , Luang Prabang and Champasak and Yao Noi Muang Poon ( Xiang Guang) betrayed jao Anouvong .
Always? Lanxang dominated South East Asia until the kingdom fractured.
That's when Siam and Vietnam was able to control Laos.
Lanxang didn't exist when Chao Anou came along. It's true that Chao Anou was betrayed. But every country has a traitor.
Look at the famous American traitor, Benedict Arnold. He was a general during the American Revolutionary War against the British and he went to the side of the British.
When it's war, you can't count on your country men to be 100% loyal.
American have many different kind of people from many countries and different race and Benedict Arnold's family came from Europe perhaps England. Lao betrayed Lao who were brother and cuisine to be in power even had to murder the own family member to bring the Siam or Vietnamese to conquer Laos.

The founding fathers of the United States were of English ancestry. They fought against England for independence. Benedict Arnold fought against the British then went to the side he was fighting against. Treason and corruption exist everywhere.
Souvanna Phouma, the prime minister of Laos at the time let the Communist in because he wanted both sides to work things out. It didn't turn out that way as we all know.
Souvanna Phouma was very honest and stupid with simple cheap trick of his younger brother . Laos should stay neutral and united and opened from all foreign investors then Laos will be more developed than Laos today.

If Laos stayed neutral , the Vietnamese army could never smuggle Lao logs in Vietnam like what we saw in Video and Vietnamese army would never dare to break any Lao laws in Laos.

Date: Aug 13, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.
Israeli has much less population than Arab but Israeli kick the Arab ass every war. Not because of number of people but the unity of the people and how intelligent their people are specially their leader and their government.
Israel is supported by the United States. Plus, Israel have modern weapons. You can't compare Laos to Israel.
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam or Thailand, then none of these countries can pick on Laos.
        Lao people chose Vietnam over the United States unlike Israel . Lane Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam and Lao always betray their own king or their own people for the power by support Siamese to beat Lao king. Lao was very big but never united and always weak.
May i corrected you about your comment ? First of all, you said'' Lao people chosen Vietnam over the United States,'' and then, you said'' Lan Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam,'' these two eras doesn't mixed. Here why, Lao PDR's chose Communist Vietnam over Superpower U.S.A. after 75 when Pathet Lao toke over the whole country because they had the same ideology, Were You surprise on that ? and as for Lan Xang, this was way way back the end of thirteen centuries, and it was six- hundred thirties something years apart. you can't mixed these two eras up. So you need to do some research on both eras before you mixed them up together.otherwise, people might confusing and misleading on this topics. and as for the Israel, they the'' Israel didn't chose America, But the Yankees choosing them because the Israel is the real friend of the United States in middle east that's the main reason, and U.S. government supporting them by giving them over two billion dollars a year for free and has the most powerful war machine in the world. Please do not assume that Israel alone beat those tugs in middle east.otherwise, Israel can't stand alone with Syria, period.
Any way Laos have always been controlled by the other country such as Burma, China , Vietnam, Siam and France . Today Laos is indirectly controlled by the Vietnamese army that you could see about the Vietnamese army smuggle Lao logs in Vietnam and no police and no Lao army dare to stop them . Soon Lao forest will be vanished . The country which the people are not united unlike Israeli, they are stick together and help each other . Look at Lao Lane Xang during Jao Anouvong , Luang Prabang and Champasak and Yao Noi Muang Poon ( Xiang Guang) betrayed jao Anouvong .
Always? Lanxang dominated South East Asia until the kingdom fractured.
That's when Siam and Vietnam was able to control Laos.
Lanxang didn't exist when Chao Anou came along. It's true that Chao Anou was betrayed. But every country has a traitor.
Look at the famous American traitor, Benedict Arnold. He was a general during the American Revolutionary War against the British and he went to the side of the British.
When it's war, you can't count on your country men to be 100% loyal.
American have many different kind of people from many countries and different race and Benedict Arnold's family came from Europe perhaps England. Lao betrayed Lao who were brother and cuisine to be in power even had to murder the own family member to bring the Siam or Vietnamese to conquer Laos.

The founding fathers of the United States were of English ancestry. They fought against England for independence. Benedict Arnold fought against the British then went to the side he was fighting against. Treason and corruption exist everywhere.
Souvanna Phouma, the prime minister of Laos at the time let the Communist in because he wanted both sides to work things out. It didn't turn out that way as we all know.
Souvanna Phouma was very honest and stupid with simple cheap trick of his younger brother . Laos should stay neutral and united and opened from all foreign investors then Laos will be more developed than Laos today.

Whatever Souvanna Phouma was thinking, I don't think he ever imagined that the Communist would turn around and backstabbed him.

Even his brother, Souphanouvong, would have never imagined "Buk Kaisone" would use him.

So in retrospect, Buk Kaisone got the best of both of them.

Date: Aug 13, 2011

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It's good for Laos to be occupied by Vietnam. Vietnam will help develop Laos since Vietnamese are talent and work hard while Lao are stupid and lazy. Vietnamese work but Lao beg as the French said, “The Vietnamese plant rice, the Cambodians watch it grow and the Lao listen to it grow.”
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam, Laos would kick Vietnam's ass any day.
Israeli has much less population than Arab but Israeli kick the Arab ass every war. Not because of number of people but the unity of the people and how intelligent their people are specially their leader and their government.
Israel is supported by the United States. Plus, Israel have modern weapons. You can't compare Laos to Israel.
If Laos have the same population as Vietnam or Thailand, then none of these countries can pick on Laos.
        Lao people chose Vietnam over the United States unlike Israel . Lane Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam and Lao always betray their own king or their own people for the power by support Siamese to beat Lao king. Lao was very big but never united and always weak.
May i corrected you about your comment ? First of all, you said'' Lao people chosen Vietnam over the United States,'' and then, you said'' Lan Xang had about the same population with Vietnam and Siam,'' these two eras doesn't mixed. Here why, Lao PDR's chose Communist Vietnam over Superpower U.S.A. after 75 when Pathet Lao toke over the whole country because they had the same ideology, Were You surprise on that ? and as for Lan Xang, this was way way back the end of thirteen centuries, and it was six- hundred thirties something years apart. you can't mixed these two eras up. So you need to do some research on both eras before you mixed them up together.otherwise, people might confusing and misleading on this topics. and as for the Israel, they the'' Israel didn't chose America, But the Yankees choosing them because the Israel is the real friend of the United States in middle east that's the main reason, and U.S. government supporting them by giving them over two billion dollars a year for free and has the most powerful war machine in the world. Please do not assume that Israel alone beat those tugs in middle east.otherwise, Israel can't stand alone with Syria, period.
Any way Laos have always been controlled by the other country such as Burma, China , Vietnam, Siam and France . Today Laos is indirectly controlled by the Vietnamese army that you could see about the Vietnamese army smuggle Lao logs in Vietnam and no police and no Lao army dare to stop them . Soon Lao forest will be vanished . The country which the people are not united unlike Israeli, they are stick together and help each other . Look at Lao Lane Xang during Jao Anouvong , Luang Prabang and Champasak and Yao Noi Muang Poon ( Xiang Guang) betrayed jao Anouvong .
Always? Lanxang dominated South East Asia until the kingdom fractured.
That's when Siam and Vietnam was able to control Laos.
Lanxang didn't exist when Chao Anou came along. It's true that Chao Anou was betrayed. But every country has a traitor.
Look at the famous American traitor, Benedict Arnold. He was a general during the American Revolutionary War against the British and he went to the side of the British.
When it's war, you can't count on your country men to be 100% loyal.
American have many different kind of people from many countries and different race and Benedict Arnold's family came from Europe perhaps England. Lao betrayed Lao who were brother and cuisine to be in power even had to murder the own family member to bring the Siam or Vietnamese to conquer Laos.

The founding fathers of the United States were of English ancestry. They fought against England for independence. Benedict Arnold fought against the British then went to the side he was fighting against. Treason and corruption exist everywhere.
Souvanna Phouma, the prime minister of Laos at the time let the Communist in because he wanted both sides to work things out. It didn't turn out that way as we all know.
Souvanna Phouma was very honest and stupid with simple cheap trick of his younger brother . Laos should stay neutral and united and opened from all foreign investors then Laos will be more developed than Laos today.
Whatever Souvanna Phouma was thinking, I don't think he ever imagined that the Communist would turn around and backstabbed him.
Even his brother, Souphanouvong, would have never imagined "Buk Kaisone" would use him.
So in retrospect, Buk Kaisone got the best of both of them.

What ever it was and what ever it is that is why the Vietnamese Army smuggle the Lao wood in Vietnam and took a lot of Lao land by the border and there are million of illegal Vietnamese are settle in Laos and nothing the Lao government could do and would not dare to say a word . Every department must have the Vietnamese consulate that is meant that Lao officer could not make any decision without consulting the Vietnamese officers.